Santiago December 9, 2007
A political party is not a movement, and who belongs to one of them knows is there voluntarily, they must accept its rules, decisions of hierarchical structures and democratic institutions it. Political parties, from the initial definitions of Hume, Rosenkranz, Michel, Weber, to the most modern and up, as Sartory and Beyme, have defined games hierarchical institutions with disciplined functional structures to objectives.
parties in Western democracies, there are movements, not a group that meets only about situational leadership or chiefdoms permeable. The latter has happened to our Latin America generally. The case of Venezuela, which, due to the weakening ethical, institutional and policy of the Social Democrats and Christian Socialists, degenerated into a party system that led to corruption and state inefficiency, which ultimately led to citizenship had been separated from the traditional parties and politicians and take notice of Hugo Chavez, is paradigmatic. Currently, both parties are underrepresented in the Venezuelan party system.
We do not want to Chile and so what happens to the DC should not be a feast for some sectors of the political elite, because the discipline, deinstitutionalization and the lack of respect for the policy applies to all equally. The weakening of the parties is at the same time the policy and, therefore, democracy, and this is only cause political instability, social and economic.
The DC, for more than two years, has made important decisions, which are summarized in bet on the leadership of Soledad Alvear. The current Senator Alvear, first defeated Adolfo Zaldivar as a presidential candidate within the DC, then beat her dolphin, Jaime Mulet, with an overwhelming victory with 70% of the votes of the party, subsequently carried out as an Ideological Congress had not done since 1991. Moreover, surveys, since the late nineties, given as the most loved and recognized by the public, and despite all this a section of the party leadership has not recognized, it's like in the forties and fifties party would not recognize the leadership of Frei, or Tomic, Leighton and Aylwin had continually questioned the President's leadership. The leaders are won by the appreciation and support that the public delivery party leaders, that it recognizes that political science from Weber differentiated leader boss versus American English.
So, what has been done Adolfo Zaldivar is disrespectful to the structures of the Christian Democrats, its institutions and its history. In this sense, his arguments are quite spurious and seriously do not believe much, your problem is not defending the middle class or the correctness of the model both quite confusing slogans and populist line, the main problem is to oppose those in the party are more popular than him and have really citizen leadership. The truth is that Adolfo Zaldivar is not very popular, does not appear in presidential polls and is one of the characters, along with Pablo Longueira, which has more rejection by the citizenry.
Respect party, its institutions and leadership of Soledad Alvear, that has not had Adolfo Zaldivar and simply must step aside, for their dignity as a politician and the result with his words, out front and not expelled would be consistent with the claims and slander that has been done, otherwise it would be so inconsequential as it was when he lost the primary election against Soledad Alvear for presidential hopeful, despite this defeat was the party presidency, demonstrating what unworthy his actions.
Males then, as Frei, Aylwin, Tomic, Gumucio, Leighton, had pride, coherence, consistency and respect, all that Adolfo Zaldivar has been shown not to have these years he has ceased to be a Democrat.
parties in Western democracies, there are movements, not a group that meets only about situational leadership or chiefdoms permeable. The latter has happened to our Latin America generally. The case of Venezuela, which, due to the weakening ethical, institutional and policy of the Social Democrats and Christian Socialists, degenerated into a party system that led to corruption and state inefficiency, which ultimately led to citizenship had been separated from the traditional parties and politicians and take notice of Hugo Chavez, is paradigmatic. Currently, both parties are underrepresented in the Venezuelan party system.
We do not want to Chile and so what happens to the DC should not be a feast for some sectors of the political elite, because the discipline, deinstitutionalization and the lack of respect for the policy applies to all equally. The weakening of the parties is at the same time the policy and, therefore, democracy, and this is only cause political instability, social and economic.
The DC, for more than two years, has made important decisions, which are summarized in bet on the leadership of Soledad Alvear. The current Senator Alvear, first defeated Adolfo Zaldivar as a presidential candidate within the DC, then beat her dolphin, Jaime Mulet, with an overwhelming victory with 70% of the votes of the party, subsequently carried out as an Ideological Congress had not done since 1991. Moreover, surveys, since the late nineties, given as the most loved and recognized by the public, and despite all this a section of the party leadership has not recognized, it's like in the forties and fifties party would not recognize the leadership of Frei, or Tomic, Leighton and Aylwin had continually questioned the President's leadership. The leaders are won by the appreciation and support that the public delivery party leaders, that it recognizes that political science from Weber differentiated leader boss versus American English.
So, what has been done Adolfo Zaldivar is disrespectful to the structures of the Christian Democrats, its institutions and its history. In this sense, his arguments are quite spurious and seriously do not believe much, your problem is not defending the middle class or the correctness of the model both quite confusing slogans and populist line, the main problem is to oppose those in the party are more popular than him and have really citizen leadership. The truth is that Adolfo Zaldivar is not very popular, does not appear in presidential polls and is one of the characters, along with Pablo Longueira, which has more rejection by the citizenry.
Respect party, its institutions and leadership of Soledad Alvear, that has not had Adolfo Zaldivar and simply must step aside, for their dignity as a politician and the result with his words, out front and not expelled would be consistent with the claims and slander that has been done, otherwise it would be so inconsequential as it was when he lost the primary election against Soledad Alvear for presidential hopeful, despite this defeat was the party presidency, demonstrating what unworthy his actions.
Males then, as Frei, Aylwin, Tomic, Gumucio, Leighton, had pride, coherence, consistency and respect, all that Adolfo Zaldivar has been shown not to have these years he has ceased to be a Democrat.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Doctor in Political Science, University of Heidelberg
. Http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias_v2/site/artic/20071208/pags/20071208194924.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment