WE WERE THE MOST BEAUTIFUL SUNDAY MY FAIR TRAVEL
CARMEN AIDA LIVE. NOV. 2010 . Yesterday hen the sun began to show his very impressive lightning and some found it important day of rest, she was saying goodbye to this earthly plane. If it was our aunt greater respect all brothers, sons, nephews, grandchildren and especially many friends because she had all the status, I sure do not have numbers to count how many were his friends because neither would have countless numbers to describe how many favors received from her, no place, time or situation where it was needed because there would be paying their collaboration, as you forget those dear aunt visits from children waited anxiously for your visits as did so many children happy for those tireless hours we threw our story, I'm sure these beautiful moments that made us all these children live nowadays men and women at some point also share with our children leave us your nephews loved aunt as many satisfactions in one way or another with them also helped us by love every one or one of our children received also want to thank you and forget it when he attended the arrival in this world of Johanna, or forget the sad stage of my accident and my son loved cuddled Manuelito . As we live we could forget your company to drive with mom at that moment when we said goodbye to Dad, and our Lord will put you there as the person responsible for dismiss that is another grace that I have to give. Aunt
leave many people today very sad because we all prepare for any occasion but never for this farewell.
That if I can assure you we're not going to forget aunt in each of our hearts hearts affection, affection, and all your blessings will last because everyone gets the best of you gave so God allowed you to live as long as we were a gift from God.
If you fail at something someday apologize to us countless blessings received a thousand kisses, and is the best ride of your life, because for those who do not meet again will be an excellent excuse, that God and the Blessed Virgin, Jesus of Divine Mercy will receive at that site saves for you and GOD bless you my beautiful. CV / LNV .
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Bottomless Pıcture
Political reforms: high-intensity Democracy
In Chile we live in a democracy, no doubt, this system has been consolidated since its advent in 1990, but the system of public freedoms and civil rights in our country is procedural and mid-range, ie we enjoyed a political system which in reality reduces democracy to limited participation from decision-making of voters, or citizens can vote in a system of limited competition, unequal and unfair. French political scientist Guy
Hermet and British sociologist Colin Crouch, have conceptualized this phenomenon as was posdemocrática or the end of democracy as originally conceived, currently set for a show elite-controlled media that when competing electorally always have an advantage over their opponents, which ultimately impairs democracy as equal and competitive political system.
The Chilean case, it represents this thesis, a binomial electoral system is not proportional, so that discourages participation, since it's already known to be elected a candidate of the two blocks (with few exceptions), on the other part of competition is uneven, the parties are not funded by the State and, despite the current electoral law, in reality there is no limit on campaign spending, so who has more resources have the greatest potential to win the election, either deputies or senators, so that the electoral period becomes a farce that turns voters into customers, where they are informed by coapts has the most ads in the mass media , and unlimited resources for merchandising, there are even candidates who have had great circus bill in support of their applications. So you can not, the race becomes the market for votes, where ideas do not win, you win the marketing, the people and the sovereign is not just a spectator. This concludes in a democracy-range, which is urgent improvement.
The discussion of voluntary or compulsory voting, you must consider above aspects, since low voter turnout is conditioned not only to voluntary or compulsory voting is much deeper, is due to the quality of democracy, when it is not competitive and equally affects participation. Is not the same voluntary voting a law of parties without state funding that these institutions to finance, ie there are candidates who are the best shoes and others barefoot. All high-intensity European democracies, funding for political parties in proportion to the votes they have obtained the previous election period, so give equal time to compete electorally and in this context voters have the opportunity to elect candidates that compete with similar resources, the difference is made by the ideas and the quality of the candidate.
certainly our democracy requires urgent and serious reform, regionalization with democratically elected regional presidents and regional parliament to change the system of government from presidential to presidentialism with a prime minister who depends on a single camera, a new proportional electoral system A modern electoral service and comptroller, the vote of Chileans abroad without conditions and mainly electoral equality which means political party financing and campaign spending control, because as things stand go straight to a plutocracy, where the "legitimacy" of the system and not based on the "sovereign people", but demagoguery and electoral marketing, which is proportional to the resources owned by the candidate. In this context
with voting obligatory or voluntary, is not guaranteed a larger share than legitimize our democracy.
V. Andres Jouannet Academic
Catholic University of Temuco
Panelist National State
In Chile we live in a democracy, no doubt, this system has been consolidated since its advent in 1990, but the system of public freedoms and civil rights in our country is procedural and mid-range, ie we enjoyed a political system which in reality reduces democracy to limited participation from decision-making of voters, or citizens can vote in a system of limited competition, unequal and unfair. French political scientist Guy
Hermet and British sociologist Colin Crouch, have conceptualized this phenomenon as was posdemocrática or the end of democracy as originally conceived, currently set for a show elite-controlled media that when competing electorally always have an advantage over their opponents, which ultimately impairs democracy as equal and competitive political system.
The Chilean case, it represents this thesis, a binomial electoral system is not proportional, so that discourages participation, since it's already known to be elected a candidate of the two blocks (with few exceptions), on the other part of competition is uneven, the parties are not funded by the State and, despite the current electoral law, in reality there is no limit on campaign spending, so who has more resources have the greatest potential to win the election, either deputies or senators, so that the electoral period becomes a farce that turns voters into customers, where they are informed by coapts has the most ads in the mass media , and unlimited resources for merchandising, there are even candidates who have had great circus bill in support of their applications. So you can not, the race becomes the market for votes, where ideas do not win, you win the marketing, the people and the sovereign is not just a spectator. This concludes in a democracy-range, which is urgent improvement.
The discussion of voluntary or compulsory voting, you must consider above aspects, since low voter turnout is conditioned not only to voluntary or compulsory voting is much deeper, is due to the quality of democracy, when it is not competitive and equally affects participation. Is not the same voluntary voting a law of parties without state funding that these institutions to finance, ie there are candidates who are the best shoes and others barefoot. All high-intensity European democracies, funding for political parties in proportion to the votes they have obtained the previous election period, so give equal time to compete electorally and in this context voters have the opportunity to elect candidates that compete with similar resources, the difference is made by the ideas and the quality of the candidate.
certainly our democracy requires urgent and serious reform, regionalization with democratically elected regional presidents and regional parliament to change the system of government from presidential to presidentialism with a prime minister who depends on a single camera, a new proportional electoral system A modern electoral service and comptroller, the vote of Chileans abroad without conditions and mainly electoral equality which means political party financing and campaign spending control, because as things stand go straight to a plutocracy, where the "legitimacy" of the system and not based on the "sovereign people", but demagoguery and electoral marketing, which is proportional to the resources owned by the candidate. In this context
with voting obligatory or voluntary, is not guaranteed a larger share than legitimize our democracy.
V. Andres Jouannet Academic
Catholic University of Temuco
Panelist National State
How To Insert Jpg File In Autocad Lt 2008
The employer and the employee. Business ethics in question
The story notes that in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, miners in northern Chile employees were paid with tokens, that they traded for wax and food in local stores installed in the mining camps. These local stores were owned by the owners of the mines, so the pay of the miners returned to the employer through the chips in their grocery stores. This practice, which stopped running by the end of the second half of last century, realized the spirit of entrepreneurship at the time, not content with paying poverty wages, they did such a way that ultimately translate to deliver pay food and some clothes.
Almost a century later, apparently around mining mining companies that still exist but no longer pay with cards, looking to save significant sums of money, failing to comply with minimum security measures in mines and their workers. The tragedy of the Mina San Jose, reminds us the worst of the mining companies, is re-discussion is a deeper issue that affects all employers in our country, the business ethics.
Business ethics, corporate responsibility beyond, since the latter has to do with social vocation and contribution to the community that makes the employer. The first, business ethics, is related to the ability of the employer to put in place for workers, consumers, users, in order is like the employer is able to see people not as working capital or means of production, but as a development partner of the firm.
When the year 2008, three pharmacy chains were caught in a price collusion, there was initial outrage and after that it was not long, although this mainly affected the most vulnerable, business ethics was placed in between that and did not occur nothing. On 27 February this year, the second biggest earthquake in Chile's history struck the south central area, most of the buildings withstood the ravages of nature, but was found in Concepción, Temuco, Talca, Ñuñoa , Maipú, among others, that there were entrepreneurs Unscrupulous construction to save on material used or low quality products that were consistent with the minimum requirements of construction, which resulted in thousands of our compatriots lost their home, but even worse, several of them lost their lives trapped between the iron bars of poor quality. Business ethics was again exposed and so far no one takes responsibility for this tragedy.
In these moments that make huge efforts to remove the 33 miners at the bottom of the San José mine, we tried at first to blame the public for failing to supervise these unscrupulous entrepreneurs, perhaps that is so, but in this drama the first responsible are the entrepreneurs who control without should have the minimum conditions of security that they are self imposed, because what is at stake every day in the mining issue is the most prized in the production chain, the lives of people, this was clearly not a priority for this mine patterns.
There is a sense of national hope to have our miners back in their homes, their families, however, beyond the outcome of this tragic and agonizing wait, I think at the end in this country, for our fragile national memory not going to happen. The ethics of the pattern, as indicated by history tabbed end up paying for the miners started their end shopping at grocery stores.
Prof. Andres Jouannet
Catholic University of Temuco
Panelist National State
The story notes that in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, miners in northern Chile employees were paid with tokens, that they traded for wax and food in local stores installed in the mining camps. These local stores were owned by the owners of the mines, so the pay of the miners returned to the employer through the chips in their grocery stores. This practice, which stopped running by the end of the second half of last century, realized the spirit of entrepreneurship at the time, not content with paying poverty wages, they did such a way that ultimately translate to deliver pay food and some clothes.
Almost a century later, apparently around mining mining companies that still exist but no longer pay with cards, looking to save significant sums of money, failing to comply with minimum security measures in mines and their workers. The tragedy of the Mina San Jose, reminds us the worst of the mining companies, is re-discussion is a deeper issue that affects all employers in our country, the business ethics.
Business ethics, corporate responsibility beyond, since the latter has to do with social vocation and contribution to the community that makes the employer. The first, business ethics, is related to the ability of the employer to put in place for workers, consumers, users, in order is like the employer is able to see people not as working capital or means of production, but as a development partner of the firm.
When the year 2008, three pharmacy chains were caught in a price collusion, there was initial outrage and after that it was not long, although this mainly affected the most vulnerable, business ethics was placed in between that and did not occur nothing. On 27 February this year, the second biggest earthquake in Chile's history struck the south central area, most of the buildings withstood the ravages of nature, but was found in Concepción, Temuco, Talca, Ñuñoa , Maipú, among others, that there were entrepreneurs Unscrupulous construction to save on material used or low quality products that were consistent with the minimum requirements of construction, which resulted in thousands of our compatriots lost their home, but even worse, several of them lost their lives trapped between the iron bars of poor quality. Business ethics was again exposed and so far no one takes responsibility for this tragedy.
In these moments that make huge efforts to remove the 33 miners at the bottom of the San José mine, we tried at first to blame the public for failing to supervise these unscrupulous entrepreneurs, perhaps that is so, but in this drama the first responsible are the entrepreneurs who control without should have the minimum conditions of security that they are self imposed, because what is at stake every day in the mining issue is the most prized in the production chain, the lives of people, this was clearly not a priority for this mine patterns.
There is a sense of national hope to have our miners back in their homes, their families, however, beyond the outcome of this tragic and agonizing wait, I think at the end in this country, for our fragile national memory not going to happen. The ethics of the pattern, as indicated by history tabbed end up paying for the miners started their end shopping at grocery stores.
Prof. Andres Jouannet
Catholic University of Temuco
Panelist National State
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)