Monday, May 26, 2008
Willa Strucuńska Tarnów
Meteorology and political
remember my friend Patrick Walker, who was visiting me back in 2002 in Heidelberg, I raised it was very difficult to beat Joaquin Lavin in the 2006 presidential election, as polls showed this far any candidate for the Concertación also be added to the fact pessimism installed in the collation of Government, an effervescence in the right-wing opposition and confusion in the Christian Democrats, thus the possibility of having a fourth government of the Concertación were very low. That was not just the opinion of a couple of the ruling coalition, but was a sensation, that by that time, had settled in the environment of the governing parties. It will be recalled, the article misunderstood Cortez Antonio Terzi "Dance of Farewell" and several were own goals with the spurious argument of alternation in government, as if by good offices he should give the government the right, and not which he noted was missing, which was good out of the government to rebuild morally, as if rule out almost immoral.
is easy to be true that General after the battle, but as I pointed out is the former President of the Chamber of Deputies, where we toured the "Way of the Philosophers" in Heidelberg, in politics a day is much longer and that a strong candidate, it required a coalition and a party (DC), with the conviction of a joint development project for the country. I remember discussing on the right, which always falls on his own contradictions undemocratic, authoritarian and arrogant, so people could change the intention or sympathy for the only candidate who ran up to that time, to another alternative.
Political science, as science predicts not only from the empirical facts draws conclusions from the medium and long range. Today and volcanologists, meteorologists and dare to predict what may happen tomorrow with the nature of Chile, which is far more predictable than the native policy. But is that now as in 2002, a number of political forecasters, casters political science, political scientists, soothsayers and all things that throw the letters, all more or less secure a premonition, note that the Coalition and the Christian Democrats lost in 2010, further, that the PDC has no chance, either in front or right front to block the socialist-liberal coalition.
If this picture was always like, Barack Obama should never have been presented as Democratic candidate for U.S. presidential elections since the war well into pre-election contained below in the polls, compared to Senator Hillary Clinton, if everything was so linear, the current President of Mexico Felipe Calderón, should never have been filed as a candidate, Manuel Lopez Obrador since surpassed it for a long time in presidential polls, for Angela Merkel to say, neither should have been deeply involved in his candidacy against Edmund Stoiber, because the latter appeared better in the polls by the bloc CDU / CSU against former Social Democratic Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the 2005 election, in short, policy if it were only make calculations in a hurry, the old President Eduardo Frei, should never have been president of Chile, that its first election of 1958 was third, and to say Don Patricio Aylwin, who some polls gave him third in the DC to be a candidate in 1989. One could go on and prove how wrong you are always people from the social picture of the moment draw conclusions from long range, this as mentioned above, nor political science can.
modern political parties to compete and try to win elections, regardless of the scenario that the polls indicate, you must read in order to serve society better, change course. The DC is the largest party in the coalition and therefore has every right to wear political candidat @ presidential but in a different mood than the current, creative, modern and respect the leadership that exist in DC, a key issue for a party that aspires to power. In this context, leaders can not be questioned in public for nonsense, not between them or against them, the leaders have to care, support and defend them, that makes a stronger party against his contenders and competitors electoral otherwise Well that should be left to political meteorologists.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Doctor of Political Science University of Heidelberg
remember my friend Patrick Walker, who was visiting me back in 2002 in Heidelberg, I raised it was very difficult to beat Joaquin Lavin in the 2006 presidential election, as polls showed this far any candidate for the Concertación also be added to the fact pessimism installed in the collation of Government, an effervescence in the right-wing opposition and confusion in the Christian Democrats, thus the possibility of having a fourth government of the Concertación were very low. That was not just the opinion of a couple of the ruling coalition, but was a sensation, that by that time, had settled in the environment of the governing parties. It will be recalled, the article misunderstood Cortez Antonio Terzi "Dance of Farewell" and several were own goals with the spurious argument of alternation in government, as if by good offices he should give the government the right, and not which he noted was missing, which was good out of the government to rebuild morally, as if rule out almost immoral.
is easy to be true that General after the battle, but as I pointed out is the former President of the Chamber of Deputies, where we toured the "Way of the Philosophers" in Heidelberg, in politics a day is much longer and that a strong candidate, it required a coalition and a party (DC), with the conviction of a joint development project for the country. I remember discussing on the right, which always falls on his own contradictions undemocratic, authoritarian and arrogant, so people could change the intention or sympathy for the only candidate who ran up to that time, to another alternative.
Political science, as science predicts not only from the empirical facts draws conclusions from the medium and long range. Today and volcanologists, meteorologists and dare to predict what may happen tomorrow with the nature of Chile, which is far more predictable than the native policy. But is that now as in 2002, a number of political forecasters, casters political science, political scientists, soothsayers and all things that throw the letters, all more or less secure a premonition, note that the Coalition and the Christian Democrats lost in 2010, further, that the PDC has no chance, either in front or right front to block the socialist-liberal coalition.
If this picture was always like, Barack Obama should never have been presented as Democratic candidate for U.S. presidential elections since the war well into pre-election contained below in the polls, compared to Senator Hillary Clinton, if everything was so linear, the current President of Mexico Felipe Calderón, should never have been filed as a candidate, Manuel Lopez Obrador since surpassed it for a long time in presidential polls, for Angela Merkel to say, neither should have been deeply involved in his candidacy against Edmund Stoiber, because the latter appeared better in the polls by the bloc CDU / CSU against former Social Democratic Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the 2005 election, in short, policy if it were only make calculations in a hurry, the old President Eduardo Frei, should never have been president of Chile, that its first election of 1958 was third, and to say Don Patricio Aylwin, who some polls gave him third in the DC to be a candidate in 1989. One could go on and prove how wrong you are always people from the social picture of the moment draw conclusions from long range, this as mentioned above, nor political science can.
modern political parties to compete and try to win elections, regardless of the scenario that the polls indicate, you must read in order to serve society better, change course. The DC is the largest party in the coalition and therefore has every right to wear political candidat @ presidential but in a different mood than the current, creative, modern and respect the leadership that exist in DC, a key issue for a party that aspires to power. In this context, leaders can not be questioned in public for nonsense, not between them or against them, the leaders have to care, support and defend them, that makes a stronger party against his contenders and competitors electoral otherwise Well that should be left to political meteorologists.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Doctor of Political Science University of Heidelberg
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Parts For Vermont Castings Wood Stoves
March 2008 Right as an ideological political dimension, it is recognized around the world since the Girondins were located right on the French Convention of 1792. The majority of Members belonging to this fraction, came from the State of the Gironde were people who, in the context of the time, were considered cults and illustrated some of its prominent representatives were, Marie Jean de Condorcet, Jean Pierre Pierre Brissot and Vergniaud Victorin. Heirs of Rousseau's thought, was the moderate side of the Convention, held that it was possible to move to a regime of greater civil liberties in conjunction with the monarchy, but thought it, not as absolute, if not constitutional, claimed that the change should occur peacefully.
That is the origin of the Republican right, classical, democratic, peaceful, at bottom right. What's the right source in Chile, for nothing. The Chilean right, is heir to the dictatorship of Pinochet, which is remembered for human rights violations, corruption, money laundering and arms trafficking. No Democrat from right, belonging to the ancient democracies, it is bound to the Pinochet dictatorship, not only are despised but fought against it, the most emblematic cases were European Christian Democrats, quienes en todos los foros mundiales denunciaron las injusticias que en Chile se cometían respecto de los derechos de las personas, al mismo tiempo, en lo mismos foros la derecha chilena defendía la obra salvadora y modernizadora de la Dictadura.
Hoy el padre de la derecha chilena está muerto, pero esta sigue los mismos moldes de sus orígenes autoritarios, versus la derecha europea, que con Cameron, Zarkozy, Rajoy se moderniza y sigue siendo fiel a la tradición de la derecha recta, moderada y democrática.
La derecha en Chile ha tenido varias oportunidades de mostrar una vocación democrática, pero al final del día, esta siempre vuelve a sus orígenes y demuestra que no es democrática y que no le interesa improve our democracy, which goes directly to the detriment of the people. Since 1991
that attempts to reform the electoral system, which is not proportional and therefore unfairly distributes forces within the parliament election, that is the coalition that has 30 plus 1 is as good as you are 60, that is an aberration, that is only possible because the Chilean right does not suit a proportional system and therefore continues to hamper the electoral reform. For that dream, with a more radical reform that allows for semi-presidentialism and parliamentarism, governors or mayors democratically elected regional parliamentarians. This is the point, right acts Interest corporate and no country, unlike the real right, European, democratic.
People realize this, and therefore in the future, despite the contradictions and errors of the Coalition, will continue to vote for the ruling coalition, either in local or parliamentary, always different presidential scenarios where play an important role other variables that have to do with the particularities of or candidates.
How far is the European right, with its history, its traditions and democratic walk, call Chilean right, with its dark recent history, with no democratic traditions, in short, so crooked and so little right.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Ph.D. in Political Science, University of Heidelberg
Incesto Italiano Clips
Respect The Right crooked politics and parties
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Doctor in Political Science, University of Heidelberg
. Http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias_v2/site/artic/20071208/pags/20071208194924.html
Santiago December 9, 2007
A political party is not a movement, and who belongs to one of them knows is there voluntarily, they must accept its rules, decisions of hierarchical structures and democratic institutions it. Political parties, from the initial definitions of Hume, Rosenkranz, Michel, Weber, to the most modern and up, as Sartory and Beyme, have defined games hierarchical institutions with disciplined functional structures to objectives.
parties in Western democracies, there are movements, not a group that meets only about situational leadership or chiefdoms permeable. The latter has happened to our Latin America generally. The case of Venezuela, which, due to the weakening ethical, institutional and policy of the Social Democrats and Christian Socialists, degenerated into a party system that led to corruption and state inefficiency, which ultimately led to citizenship had been separated from the traditional parties and politicians and take notice of Hugo Chavez, is paradigmatic. Currently, both parties are underrepresented in the Venezuelan party system.
We do not want to Chile and so what happens to the DC should not be a feast for some sectors of the political elite, because the discipline, deinstitutionalization and the lack of respect for the policy applies to all equally. The weakening of the parties is at the same time the policy and, therefore, democracy, and this is only cause political instability, social and economic.
The DC, for more than two years, has made important decisions, which are summarized in bet on the leadership of Soledad Alvear. The current Senator Alvear, first defeated Adolfo Zaldivar as a presidential candidate within the DC, then beat her dolphin, Jaime Mulet, with an overwhelming victory with 70% of the votes of the party, subsequently carried out as an Ideological Congress had not done since 1991. Moreover, surveys, since the late nineties, given as the most loved and recognized by the public, and despite all this a section of the party leadership has not recognized, it's like in the forties and fifties party would not recognize the leadership of Frei, or Tomic, Leighton and Aylwin had continually questioned the President's leadership. The leaders are won by the appreciation and support that the public delivery party leaders, that it recognizes that political science from Weber differentiated leader boss versus American English.
So, what has been done Adolfo Zaldivar is disrespectful to the structures of the Christian Democrats, its institutions and its history. In this sense, his arguments are quite spurious and seriously do not believe much, your problem is not defending the middle class or the correctness of the model both quite confusing slogans and populist line, the main problem is to oppose those in the party are more popular than him and have really citizen leadership. The truth is that Adolfo Zaldivar is not very popular, does not appear in presidential polls and is one of the characters, along with Pablo Longueira, which has more rejection by the citizenry.
Respect party, its institutions and leadership of Soledad Alvear, that has not had Adolfo Zaldivar and simply must step aside, for their dignity as a politician and the result with his words, out front and not expelled would be consistent with the claims and slander that has been done, otherwise it would be so inconsequential as it was when he lost the primary election against Soledad Alvear for presidential hopeful, despite this defeat was the party presidency, demonstrating what unworthy his actions.
Males then, as Frei, Aylwin, Tomic, Gumucio, Leighton, had pride, coherence, consistency and respect, all that Adolfo Zaldivar has been shown not to have these years he has ceased to be a Democrat.
parties in Western democracies, there are movements, not a group that meets only about situational leadership or chiefdoms permeable. The latter has happened to our Latin America generally. The case of Venezuela, which, due to the weakening ethical, institutional and policy of the Social Democrats and Christian Socialists, degenerated into a party system that led to corruption and state inefficiency, which ultimately led to citizenship had been separated from the traditional parties and politicians and take notice of Hugo Chavez, is paradigmatic. Currently, both parties are underrepresented in the Venezuelan party system.
We do not want to Chile and so what happens to the DC should not be a feast for some sectors of the political elite, because the discipline, deinstitutionalization and the lack of respect for the policy applies to all equally. The weakening of the parties is at the same time the policy and, therefore, democracy, and this is only cause political instability, social and economic.
The DC, for more than two years, has made important decisions, which are summarized in bet on the leadership of Soledad Alvear. The current Senator Alvear, first defeated Adolfo Zaldivar as a presidential candidate within the DC, then beat her dolphin, Jaime Mulet, with an overwhelming victory with 70% of the votes of the party, subsequently carried out as an Ideological Congress had not done since 1991. Moreover, surveys, since the late nineties, given as the most loved and recognized by the public, and despite all this a section of the party leadership has not recognized, it's like in the forties and fifties party would not recognize the leadership of Frei, or Tomic, Leighton and Aylwin had continually questioned the President's leadership. The leaders are won by the appreciation and support that the public delivery party leaders, that it recognizes that political science from Weber differentiated leader boss versus American English.
So, what has been done Adolfo Zaldivar is disrespectful to the structures of the Christian Democrats, its institutions and its history. In this sense, his arguments are quite spurious and seriously do not believe much, your problem is not defending the middle class or the correctness of the model both quite confusing slogans and populist line, the main problem is to oppose those in the party are more popular than him and have really citizen leadership. The truth is that Adolfo Zaldivar is not very popular, does not appear in presidential polls and is one of the characters, along with Pablo Longueira, which has more rejection by the citizenry.
Respect party, its institutions and leadership of Soledad Alvear, that has not had Adolfo Zaldivar and simply must step aside, for their dignity as a politician and the result with his words, out front and not expelled would be consistent with the claims and slander that has been done, otherwise it would be so inconsequential as it was when he lost the primary election against Soledad Alvear for presidential hopeful, despite this defeat was the party presidency, demonstrating what unworthy his actions.
Males then, as Frei, Aylwin, Tomic, Gumucio, Leighton, had pride, coherence, consistency and respect, all that Adolfo Zaldivar has been shown not to have these years he has ceased to be a Democrat.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
Doctor in Political Science, University of Heidelberg
. Http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias_v2/site/artic/20071208/pags/20071208194924.html
Tetralysal Can You Wax
Chile in the heart of DC: Congress of the ideas
October 12, 2007
October 12, 2007
witnessing a globalized world , connected and more transparent. Today we can see more clearly the light and dark tiene nuestra sociedad y eso nos permite darnos cuenta de cuestiones que simplemente antes no veíamos. Las comunicaciones han sido fundamentalmente las responsables de este cambio impresionante que ha experimentado el mundo los últimos años. Hacia fines de la década de los 70, Giovanni Sartori, en su obra "Homo Videns", llamaba la atención a los políticos, en cuanto a que la política como se conocía anteriormente ya no iba a ser la misma. La irrupción de los medios de comunicación de masas, especialmente la televisión, rompía las viejas formas de relación entre los políticos y la sociedad, más aún, los partidos políticos que no entendieran esto sucumbirían con los hechos concretos communications which required him to the political class.
is at that point where we are today, despite Sartori already touted for years, as Christian Democrats still can not understand that we are social in a showcase where people can see ourselves clearly and follow our behavior, conduct, decisions . When politicians make such a party or that, people are watching. We give all the speeches, they are fired and we do not believe if our behaviors are not consistent with what we defend: freedom, justice and solidarity.
Our compatriots expect much of the Fifth Congress of the DC, hence the ideas must come finally allow us to take the expected jump into development, so that ordinary people can live with more dignity. This Congress is not only an opportunity for our party to renew, modernize and understand the codes of society, the Fifth Congress of the DC is an opportunity for Chile, for the biggest game of the last 50 years should give driving policy in our country, which in turn it gives them a better quality of life for all its inhabitants.
So whatever happens from here is going to impact both the Christian Democrats as the Chileans expect a lot of us, but mainly in the Fifth Congress should get out more united than ever to face the challenges that Congress will impose. This is done only in fraternity, this is how we look at the Christian Democrats, this is the sublime expression of the bargain between comrades, brotherhood is the possibility of communion between freedom and equality. The brotherhood is more relevant than ever, it is a social model across the individualism of liberal freedom and equality, collectivism egalitarian brotherhood based on people seeking the common good through a sustainable, harmonious and complementary with the environment. Fraternity brings us to care for and support the society through collective action in the community and through the principle of subsidiarity follow in solidarity with the people of the community who need the state to overcome their social needs. Fraternity as a principle in effect is the possibility of overcoming egalitarianism and selfishness of the old ways antithetical expressions equality and freedom, which for two centuries and a half have tried absolutely imposed upon each other.
Therefore, Congress has the opportunity to think about this new partnership and we show ourselves as it is a chance that DC have to meet again in the fellowship of Christian Democrats, Congress is mostly a gathering of ideas, we can respond to the challenges this new century has brought us. The Fifth Congress will do for the country, its people, we will do because Chile is at the heart of DC.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
V Congress Executive Secretary Christian Democratic Party Ideological
Chile
http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias_v2/site/artic/20071011/pags/20071011214938.html
is at that point where we are today, despite Sartori already touted for years, as Christian Democrats still can not understand that we are social in a showcase where people can see ourselves clearly and follow our behavior, conduct, decisions . When politicians make such a party or that, people are watching. We give all the speeches, they are fired and we do not believe if our behaviors are not consistent with what we defend: freedom, justice and solidarity.
Our compatriots expect much of the Fifth Congress of the DC, hence the ideas must come finally allow us to take the expected jump into development, so that ordinary people can live with more dignity. This Congress is not only an opportunity for our party to renew, modernize and understand the codes of society, the Fifth Congress of the DC is an opportunity for Chile, for the biggest game of the last 50 years should give driving policy in our country, which in turn it gives them a better quality of life for all its inhabitants.
So whatever happens from here is going to impact both the Christian Democrats as the Chileans expect a lot of us, but mainly in the Fifth Congress should get out more united than ever to face the challenges that Congress will impose. This is done only in fraternity, this is how we look at the Christian Democrats, this is the sublime expression of the bargain between comrades, brotherhood is the possibility of communion between freedom and equality. The brotherhood is more relevant than ever, it is a social model across the individualism of liberal freedom and equality, collectivism egalitarian brotherhood based on people seeking the common good through a sustainable, harmonious and complementary with the environment. Fraternity brings us to care for and support the society through collective action in the community and through the principle of subsidiarity follow in solidarity with the people of the community who need the state to overcome their social needs. Fraternity as a principle in effect is the possibility of overcoming egalitarianism and selfishness of the old ways antithetical expressions equality and freedom, which for two centuries and a half have tried absolutely imposed upon each other.
Therefore, Congress has the opportunity to think about this new partnership and we show ourselves as it is a chance that DC have to meet again in the fellowship of Christian Democrats, Congress is mostly a gathering of ideas, we can respond to the challenges this new century has brought us. The Fifth Congress will do for the country, its people, we will do because Chile is at the heart of DC.
Andres Jouannet Valderrama
V Congress Executive Secretary Christian Democratic Party Ideological
Chile
http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias_v2/site/artic/20071011/pags/20071011214938.html
Best 4x4 Suv Sleeping
Congress the DC
Santiago March 12, 2007
political parties according to Klaus von Beyme have four basic functions) Homing (ideologies and programs), b) interest articulation and aggregation social, c) mobilization and socialization of citizens especially in election period, d) recruitment of elites and the formation of governments. In the Chilean case, the parties have compliance diffuse and in some cases minimal.
Moreover, the parties now, as are old or consolidated democracies are in transition mostly popular type of party electoral professional one, but most parties are in the latter type , as is the case of PP and PSOE in Spain, CDU and SPD in Germany, the Conservatives and Labour in England, France, Socialists and Republicans, Democrats and Republicans in the United States between others.
In the Chilean case, the parties are in that transition to electoral professional party. The PPD and UDI are parties with little historical tradition, so they would frame as Katz and Maier called party lineup, on the other hand, is the case of PRSD, PS, RN and especially DC are so-called party popular type.
popular parties are the parties of the leader, the political operator, the patronage of the State. For its part, the electoral professional party is the party of the media, the manager of the opinion polls and ideas.
As in Chile there is a modern party itself, what DC is at stake in the V Congress (August 2006 to October 2007), modernized, like it or not, some of its members than ever flying the flags of past glories. Therefore, the dilemma that is the party of the Falange, is transformed into a professional electoral party or succumb to the passing of the years to disappear, renamed or merged with another party, we already lived the Italian DC and contrary to this the German CDU, in the early '1980s, went from a popular type party electoral professional one, which allowed it to be the largest party in Germany's political system.
While the DC Congress will review and update their principles ideological, the most important thing to leave this conference, and that clearly has to do with their ideas, is related to the transformation into a professional electoral party, namely, a modern party in connection with their constituents and the public, a party Century 21 in bureaucratic structure consistent with a picture and show it as action that modern party, without improvisation and, of course, with a single story, unity and mission.
DC Congress is the opportunity, with the first stage, listening to Chile, is on the correct line, the shut up and listen to what people want to tell the party and with that diagnosis to start designing the future project is based on how people want to see the DC in the coming years.
ideology This thought process is not only good for the DC but also for the entire party system in Chile, which will benefit from a modern party, what will be an influence for the rest. Institutionalized and modern games, help you have a better democracy and, therefore, the quality of life of people.
V. Andres Jouannet Dr.
Political Science University of Heidelberg 
Santiago March 12, 2007
political parties according to Klaus von Beyme have four basic functions) Homing (ideologies and programs), b) interest articulation and aggregation social, c) mobilization and socialization of citizens especially in election period, d) recruitment of elites and the formation of governments. In the Chilean case, the parties have compliance diffuse and in some cases minimal.
Moreover, the parties now, as are old or consolidated democracies are in transition mostly popular type of party electoral professional one, but most parties are in the latter type , as is the case of PP and PSOE in Spain, CDU and SPD in Germany, the Conservatives and Labour in England, France, Socialists and Republicans, Democrats and Republicans in the United States between others.
In the Chilean case, the parties are in that transition to electoral professional party. The PPD and UDI are parties with little historical tradition, so they would frame as Katz and Maier called party lineup, on the other hand, is the case of PRSD, PS, RN and especially DC are so-called party popular type.
popular parties are the parties of the leader, the political operator, the patronage of the State. For its part, the electoral professional party is the party of the media, the manager of the opinion polls and ideas.
As in Chile there is a modern party itself, what DC is at stake in the V Congress (August 2006 to October 2007), modernized, like it or not, some of its members than ever flying the flags of past glories. Therefore, the dilemma that is the party of the Falange, is transformed into a professional electoral party or succumb to the passing of the years to disappear, renamed or merged with another party, we already lived the Italian DC and contrary to this the German CDU, in the early '1980s, went from a popular type party electoral professional one, which allowed it to be the largest party in Germany's political system.
While the DC Congress will review and update their principles ideological, the most important thing to leave this conference, and that clearly has to do with their ideas, is related to the transformation into a professional electoral party, namely, a modern party in connection with their constituents and the public, a party Century 21 in bureaucratic structure consistent with a picture and show it as action that modern party, without improvisation and, of course, with a single story, unity and mission.
DC Congress is the opportunity, with the first stage, listening to Chile, is on the correct line, the shut up and listen to what people want to tell the party and with that diagnosis to start designing the future project is based on how people want to see the DC in the coming years.
ideology This thought process is not only good for the DC but also for the entire party system in Chile, which will benefit from a modern party, what will be an influence for the rest. Institutionalized and modern games, help you have a better democracy and, therefore, the quality of life of people.
V. Andres Jouannet Dr.
Political Science University of Heidelberg
Will Vodka Make Impotence?
reveal oneself sell
Santiago September 15, 2006
Even when it was the phrase of several bystanders I ran with the Alameda the night of 11 September and that, unable to take the buses that would take them home, walking outraged and resigned to a violent group not allowed to arrive soon to your home. Then the next morning, all was desolation where hordes of vandals had passed.
The image we have designed these days to the world and ourselves, is that of a broken country, where modernity and its profits have not reached everyone. Therefore, this currency to be more open, transparent our differences and shortcomings. Chile's provincial regions in solitary confinement and a number we Chile globalized commercial agreements with Internet, TV reality shows and trash programs Jetset Creole pathetic. Chile's isolated, incommunicado from the 80s we moved to the country that grows more than any in Latin America, BMWs, Porches, Mercedes on the streets, but also tricycles pickers. Chile's authoritarian, we go to Chile of freedom, where expression is not a crime. Chile's anonymous, we move to a Chile that is observed and is traversed by yellow buses and the delayed Transantiago.
Chile Modernization brought a more prosperous, but that prosperity is possible to see through the windows in plasma TVs, does not reach the suburbs of cities in Chile, especially Santiago and it clear that it is frustrating. In short we have freedom, but as noted by Gerald Allan Cohen, this is not real and fully when social differences are extreme in certain sectors of the population, ie, lack of resources is against the possibility of having degrees of freedom growing. In this sense, poverty, defined as absence or lack of money, constitutes a threat to freedom, however, even though this approach seems to be valid it might be asked, yes, lack of money, lack of freedom, as argued in Cohen vehemently, then I wonder, how much money it takes to be truly free? What is the minimum to start to be a bit off? However, I am certain that the total lack of means and minimum means for living, undermine the freedom of individuals. However, as more general lack of freedom is the difference that gives respect of access to goods that people have. This is the familiar discussion of the distribution of income in Chile is outrageously unjust nations of the world. Therefore, we have a modern, free in their institutions but unfair in terms of access.
This is no justification for the Sept. 11 vandalism, violence as expressed in this journey is explained by different circumstances. There is dissatisfaction on the part of social sectors to the current system, despite this, their protest is peaceful and democratic ways to give, which is related to the organization and participation in intermediate bodies. This showed us some residents of Peñalolen, that same September 11 all night defended his office, so that the masked not destroyed. Those who come to destroy and shoot, do not for the deficiency of freedom they possess, or to defend the poor in Chile, do so because their behavior unstructured and without commitment to ideas or movements can destroy them, knowing that the social sanction diluted, that the courts do not constrain freedom and forget the collective consciousness quickly to this horde of attackers, but above all, his reaction is a validation in your group, your group, your urban tribe, which does not disapprove these actions, validate and even justified, as some leftist movements. In short, this action becomes a cool activity and low social sanction, even family, as indicated by Canadian sociologists Heath and Potter, today "rebel sell".
One way to address urban terrorism, we saw that day, is supporting those who, despite having been excluded from important degrees of freedom, as the inhabitants of Peñalolén who defended his office, involved the bright side of modernity and do not want to see Chile with a Molotov at La Moneda.
V. Andres Jouannet Dr.
Political Science University of Heidelberg 
Santiago September 15, 2006
Even when it was the phrase of several bystanders I ran with the Alameda the night of 11 September and that, unable to take the buses that would take them home, walking outraged and resigned to a violent group not allowed to arrive soon to your home. Then the next morning, all was desolation where hordes of vandals had passed.
The image we have designed these days to the world and ourselves, is that of a broken country, where modernity and its profits have not reached everyone. Therefore, this currency to be more open, transparent our differences and shortcomings. Chile's provincial regions in solitary confinement and a number we Chile globalized commercial agreements with Internet, TV reality shows and trash programs Jetset Creole pathetic. Chile's isolated, incommunicado from the 80s we moved to the country that grows more than any in Latin America, BMWs, Porches, Mercedes on the streets, but also tricycles pickers. Chile's authoritarian, we go to Chile of freedom, where expression is not a crime. Chile's anonymous, we move to a Chile that is observed and is traversed by yellow buses and the delayed Transantiago.
Chile Modernization brought a more prosperous, but that prosperity is possible to see through the windows in plasma TVs, does not reach the suburbs of cities in Chile, especially Santiago and it clear that it is frustrating. In short we have freedom, but as noted by Gerald Allan Cohen, this is not real and fully when social differences are extreme in certain sectors of the population, ie, lack of resources is against the possibility of having degrees of freedom growing. In this sense, poverty, defined as absence or lack of money, constitutes a threat to freedom, however, even though this approach seems to be valid it might be asked, yes, lack of money, lack of freedom, as argued in Cohen vehemently, then I wonder, how much money it takes to be truly free? What is the minimum to start to be a bit off? However, I am certain that the total lack of means and minimum means for living, undermine the freedom of individuals. However, as more general lack of freedom is the difference that gives respect of access to goods that people have. This is the familiar discussion of the distribution of income in Chile is outrageously unjust nations of the world. Therefore, we have a modern, free in their institutions but unfair in terms of access.
This is no justification for the Sept. 11 vandalism, violence as expressed in this journey is explained by different circumstances. There is dissatisfaction on the part of social sectors to the current system, despite this, their protest is peaceful and democratic ways to give, which is related to the organization and participation in intermediate bodies. This showed us some residents of Peñalolen, that same September 11 all night defended his office, so that the masked not destroyed. Those who come to destroy and shoot, do not for the deficiency of freedom they possess, or to defend the poor in Chile, do so because their behavior unstructured and without commitment to ideas or movements can destroy them, knowing that the social sanction diluted, that the courts do not constrain freedom and forget the collective consciousness quickly to this horde of attackers, but above all, his reaction is a validation in your group, your group, your urban tribe, which does not disapprove these actions, validate and even justified, as some leftist movements. In short, this action becomes a cool activity and low social sanction, even family, as indicated by Canadian sociologists Heath and Potter, today "rebel sell".
One way to address urban terrorism, we saw that day, is supporting those who, despite having been excluded from important degrees of freedom, as the inhabitants of Peñalolén who defended his office, involved the bright side of modernity and do not want to see Chile with a Molotov at La Moneda.
V. Andres Jouannet Dr.
Political Science University of Heidelberg
How To Get Poemon Online On Mac
Democracy and serious participation in Internet
Santiago, September 13, 2006
Certainly our interconnected global world, far from the cabin of Henry David Thoreau, that old precursor of civil disobedience. Today we recognize ourselves in this global village global, diverse, multicultural, cosmopolitan. In this recognition of diversity is implicit respect for the human person, which is essentially equal in their human value but different in their origin. Just in how different is the richness of cultural diversity, hence arises the respect that we have as individuals who demonstrate participation of the different cultural expressions in the context of a heterogeneous society.
We live in a society today in politics, marketing and communications, full of different people whose fates are sometimes played by the flight of a butterfly. A complex and fragile, more real and transparent, more open and spacious, but cruel at the time of competition, a world with diverse culture, multiple ...
On this I agree with Heath and Potter Canadian sociologists, who say that "We do not live in 'Parent', or in the spectacle. The truth is that the world we live in is much more prosaic. It consists of billions of human beings, each with its own concept of well-trying to cooperate more or less success. There is no single, comprehensive all-encompassing. Unable to lock the culture because 'culture' and 'system' does not exist as isolated events. What you need is a potpourri of social institutions, mostly grouped tentatively divided the advantages and disadvantages of social cooperation in a fair sometimes, but usually very unfair "
This justice is when we are talking about aim to recognize the participation of people in democracy.
These days it has raised considerable controversy (not the same discussion) on these or not President Bachelet said the city government. Such artificial and not very conducive controversy, is given by the gap in understanding what is democracy in its nature and origin.
The current democracy is representative democracy we understand and therefore do not fit any other names, call delegative, participatory citizenship, etc. Democracy is about the minimum is and respects civil liberties and civil rights that is required of him. But democracy is essentially a government the people who are participating in the civic or citizens.
On democracy, whether the concept or practice, has been discussed since at least 2500 years, since the middle of the sixth century BC was inaugurated in Chios, Greece. While Chios was the first city-state that experienced these changes, evolving into a democracy form of government, will be at Athens where democracy does its best at that time. By the year 507 BC the Athenians adopted a popular government that would last almost two centuries until it was conquered by the Macedonians, around 321 BC, before being submitted to the Romans. For the Greeks el termino democracia o demokratia, venía de las palabras griegas demos, que es pueblo, y kratos que significa gobierno. Es interesante observar como indistintamente el termino demos se utilizaba para señalar a la gente corriente, incluido los pobres, sin embargo cuando se hacía referencia a la palabra democracia, se estaba indicando peyorativamente a la gente común, por parte de la aristocracia, a quien se había despojado del gobierno. En todo caso para los atenienses y para muchas ciudades-estados griegos, la palabra democracia significaba el gobierno que permitía la participación más amplia de los denominados ciudadanos, vale decir el gobierno ciudadano.
La democracia ateniense, ha sido generalmente expuesta in different ways, and even depending on the source, have highlighted one or another feature, however the clear source for the operation and organic it can be found in the funeral oration, which is attributed to Pericles, the speech written Tucides probably highlights the political power of Athens. In this eulogy described citizens as parts and components for the creation of a common life. Citizens should not be differentiated by rank or wealth. The demos, it was what was meant by the sovereign power, or the authority having legislative and judicial powers. Therefore, the citizen can and should take direct roles in administration of the city-state.
Athenian democracy was characterized by commitment, which they called, civic virtue, which was occupied by the state of the polis, subordinating the private affairs of public issue, public affairs or the thing was about Private. Civic virtue could only happen in the polls, because only then ethics and politics could combine to embody civic virtue.
Another source describes the ancient Greek democracy notably is the work of Aristotle, Politics (conducted between 335 and 323 BC), exposes and explains the functioning of that system of government, This does not mean a defense of it.
Democracy, as described, is characterized by combining with equal freedom, in other words, classical democracy necessarily implies freedom and this in turn requires equality will develop to full, this was one of the arguments of Aristotle , which led him to question this type of government.
opens at this time Homo Politicus, whose ideal was a citizen in possession of civic virtue, which was achieved through political action. Political action took place in the city and its fullness was the participation of homo politicus or Kratos or citizen in the government.
Well, here comes the question as city government, that although it was in its time the so-called direct democracy and which today is known as representative, in spirit and nature of democracy is the city government, which exists when expresses the full democracy, as is the case of Chile.
Since we unveiled what it means democracy, which is nothing more nor less than city government, let me go into the question of participation and expressions of social unrest we have seen in recent months, especially after we saw as a bomb Molotov was fastened to the Currency and explains why this phenomenon ...
So when was the phrase of several passers-by which I passed by the Alameda the night of 11 September and that, unable to take the buses that would take them home, walking outraged and resigned to a non-violent group allowed to arrive soon to your home. Then the next morning, all was desolation where hordes of vandals had passed.
The image we have designed these days to the world and ourselves, is that of a broken country, where modernity and its profits have not reached everyone. Therefore, this currency to be more open, transparent our differences and shortcomings.
Del Chile provincial regions incommunicado and a number we Chile globalized trade agreements with Internet, TV reality shows and trash programs Jetset Creole pathetic. From Chile
isolated and held incommunicado from the 80s we moved to the country that grows more than any in Latin America, BMWs, Porches, Mercedes on the streets, but also tricycles pickers. The
authoritarian Chile, we moved to Chile of freedom, where expression is not a crime. From Chile
anonymous, we move to a Chile that is observed and is traversed by yellow buses and the delayed Transantiago.
Chile Modernization brought a more prosperous, but that prosperity you can see from the windows in plasma TVs, does not reach the areas or the suburbs of cities in Chile, especially Santiago and that of course it's frustrating. In short we have freedom, but as noted by Gerald Allan Cohen, this is not real and fully when social differences are extreme in certain sectors of the population, ie, lack of resources is against the possibility of having degrees of freedom growing. In this sense, poverty, defined as absence or lack of money, constitutes a threat to freedom, however, even though this approach seems to be valid it might be asked, yes, lack of money, lack of freedom, as Cohen argues vehemently, then I wonder, how much money it takes to be truly free? What is the minimum to start being a bit off? However, I am certain that the total lack of means and minimum means for living, undermine the freedom of individuals. However, as more general lack of freedom is the difference that gives respect of access to goods that people have. That is, the familiar discussion of the distribution of income in Chile is outrageously unjust nations of the world. Therefore, we have a modern, free in their institutions but unfair in terms of access.
This is no justification for vandalism 11 September, as expressed in violence that day was due to different circumstances. There is disaffection from social sectors to the current system, despite this, their protest is peaceful and democratic ways to give, which is related to the organization and participation in intermediate bodies. This showed us some residents of Peñalolen, that same September 11 all night defended his office, so that the masked not destroyed. About
out to destroy and shoot, do not for the deficiency of freedom they possess, or to defend the poor in Chile, do so because their behavior unstructured and without obligation ideas or movements allows them to destroy the knowledge that the social penalty is diluted, that the courts do not constrain freedom and collective consciousness quickly forget this horde of attackers, but above all, your reaction is a validation in its group , your group, your urban tribe, who condemns these actions, validate and even justified, as some leftist movements. In short, this action becomes a cool activity and low social sanction, even family, as indicated by Canadian sociologists Heath and Potter, today, "revealed sells."
One way to address urban terrorism, we saw that day, is supporting those who, despite having been excluded from important degrees of freedom, as the inhabitants of Peñalolén who defended his office, part of the bright side of modernity and do not want to see Chile with a Molotov at La Moneda.
The first part I explained about democracy as an expression of city government, saying the second concerning the causes of violent participation in democracy. If you have listened carefully to both arguments, we realize that democracy in this country the necessary conditions for citizens to participate and express themselves, but it depends on us to use participation as a way of deepening democracy improve in terms of quality and intensity.
Participation is not theoretical, but it is the soul of democracy and without this scheme can not exist. In this regard, I take the words of German philosopher Hannah Arendt, who said precisely on this point, that: "Democracy must provide opportunities for people to settle as citizens or as participants in democracy.
V. Andres Jouannet
Doctor of Political Science University of Heidelberg
Santiago, September 13, 2006
Certainly our interconnected global world, far from the cabin of Henry David Thoreau, that old precursor of civil disobedience. Today we recognize ourselves in this global village global, diverse, multicultural, cosmopolitan. In this recognition of diversity is implicit respect for the human person, which is essentially equal in their human value but different in their origin. Just in how different is the richness of cultural diversity, hence arises the respect that we have as individuals who demonstrate participation of the different cultural expressions in the context of a heterogeneous society.
We live in a society today in politics, marketing and communications, full of different people whose fates are sometimes played by the flight of a butterfly. A complex and fragile, more real and transparent, more open and spacious, but cruel at the time of competition, a world with diverse culture, multiple ...
On this I agree with Heath and Potter Canadian sociologists, who say that "We do not live in 'Parent', or in the spectacle. The truth is that the world we live in is much more prosaic. It consists of billions of human beings, each with its own concept of well-trying to cooperate more or less success. There is no single, comprehensive all-encompassing. Unable to lock the culture because 'culture' and 'system' does not exist as isolated events. What you need is a potpourri of social institutions, mostly grouped tentatively divided the advantages and disadvantages of social cooperation in a fair sometimes, but usually very unfair "
This justice is when we are talking about aim to recognize the participation of people in democracy.
These days it has raised considerable controversy (not the same discussion) on these or not President Bachelet said the city government. Such artificial and not very conducive controversy, is given by the gap in understanding what is democracy in its nature and origin.
The current democracy is representative democracy we understand and therefore do not fit any other names, call delegative, participatory citizenship, etc. Democracy is about the minimum is and respects civil liberties and civil rights that is required of him. But democracy is essentially a government the people who are participating in the civic or citizens.
On democracy, whether the concept or practice, has been discussed since at least 2500 years, since the middle of the sixth century BC was inaugurated in Chios, Greece. While Chios was the first city-state that experienced these changes, evolving into a democracy form of government, will be at Athens where democracy does its best at that time. By the year 507 BC the Athenians adopted a popular government that would last almost two centuries until it was conquered by the Macedonians, around 321 BC, before being submitted to the Romans. For the Greeks el termino democracia o demokratia, venía de las palabras griegas demos, que es pueblo, y kratos que significa gobierno. Es interesante observar como indistintamente el termino demos se utilizaba para señalar a la gente corriente, incluido los pobres, sin embargo cuando se hacía referencia a la palabra democracia, se estaba indicando peyorativamente a la gente común, por parte de la aristocracia, a quien se había despojado del gobierno. En todo caso para los atenienses y para muchas ciudades-estados griegos, la palabra democracia significaba el gobierno que permitía la participación más amplia de los denominados ciudadanos, vale decir el gobierno ciudadano.
La democracia ateniense, ha sido generalmente expuesta in different ways, and even depending on the source, have highlighted one or another feature, however the clear source for the operation and organic it can be found in the funeral oration, which is attributed to Pericles, the speech written Tucides probably highlights the political power of Athens. In this eulogy described citizens as parts and components for the creation of a common life. Citizens should not be differentiated by rank or wealth. The demos, it was what was meant by the sovereign power, or the authority having legislative and judicial powers. Therefore, the citizen can and should take direct roles in administration of the city-state.
Athenian democracy was characterized by commitment, which they called, civic virtue, which was occupied by the state of the polis, subordinating the private affairs of public issue, public affairs or the thing was about Private. Civic virtue could only happen in the polls, because only then ethics and politics could combine to embody civic virtue.
Another source describes the ancient Greek democracy notably is the work of Aristotle, Politics (conducted between 335 and 323 BC), exposes and explains the functioning of that system of government, This does not mean a defense of it.
Democracy, as described, is characterized by combining with equal freedom, in other words, classical democracy necessarily implies freedom and this in turn requires equality will develop to full, this was one of the arguments of Aristotle , which led him to question this type of government.
opens at this time Homo Politicus, whose ideal was a citizen in possession of civic virtue, which was achieved through political action. Political action took place in the city and its fullness was the participation of homo politicus or Kratos or citizen in the government.
Well, here comes the question as city government, that although it was in its time the so-called direct democracy and which today is known as representative, in spirit and nature of democracy is the city government, which exists when expresses the full democracy, as is the case of Chile.
Since we unveiled what it means democracy, which is nothing more nor less than city government, let me go into the question of participation and expressions of social unrest we have seen in recent months, especially after we saw as a bomb Molotov was fastened to the Currency and explains why this phenomenon ...
So when was the phrase of several passers-by which I passed by the Alameda the night of 11 September and that, unable to take the buses that would take them home, walking outraged and resigned to a non-violent group allowed to arrive soon to your home. Then the next morning, all was desolation where hordes of vandals had passed.
The image we have designed these days to the world and ourselves, is that of a broken country, where modernity and its profits have not reached everyone. Therefore, this currency to be more open, transparent our differences and shortcomings.
Del Chile provincial regions incommunicado and a number we Chile globalized trade agreements with Internet, TV reality shows and trash programs Jetset Creole pathetic. From Chile
isolated and held incommunicado from the 80s we moved to the country that grows more than any in Latin America, BMWs, Porches, Mercedes on the streets, but also tricycles pickers. The
authoritarian Chile, we moved to Chile of freedom, where expression is not a crime. From Chile
anonymous, we move to a Chile that is observed and is traversed by yellow buses and the delayed Transantiago.
Chile Modernization brought a more prosperous, but that prosperity you can see from the windows in plasma TVs, does not reach the areas or the suburbs of cities in Chile, especially Santiago and that of course it's frustrating. In short we have freedom, but as noted by Gerald Allan Cohen, this is not real and fully when social differences are extreme in certain sectors of the population, ie, lack of resources is against the possibility of having degrees of freedom growing. In this sense, poverty, defined as absence or lack of money, constitutes a threat to freedom, however, even though this approach seems to be valid it might be asked, yes, lack of money, lack of freedom, as Cohen argues vehemently, then I wonder, how much money it takes to be truly free? What is the minimum to start being a bit off? However, I am certain that the total lack of means and minimum means for living, undermine the freedom of individuals. However, as more general lack of freedom is the difference that gives respect of access to goods that people have. That is, the familiar discussion of the distribution of income in Chile is outrageously unjust nations of the world. Therefore, we have a modern, free in their institutions but unfair in terms of access.
This is no justification for vandalism 11 September, as expressed in violence that day was due to different circumstances. There is disaffection from social sectors to the current system, despite this, their protest is peaceful and democratic ways to give, which is related to the organization and participation in intermediate bodies. This showed us some residents of Peñalolen, that same September 11 all night defended his office, so that the masked not destroyed. About
out to destroy and shoot, do not for the deficiency of freedom they possess, or to defend the poor in Chile, do so because their behavior unstructured and without obligation ideas or movements allows them to destroy the knowledge that the social penalty is diluted, that the courts do not constrain freedom and collective consciousness quickly forget this horde of attackers, but above all, your reaction is a validation in its group , your group, your urban tribe, who condemns these actions, validate and even justified, as some leftist movements. In short, this action becomes a cool activity and low social sanction, even family, as indicated by Canadian sociologists Heath and Potter, today, "revealed sells."
One way to address urban terrorism, we saw that day, is supporting those who, despite having been excluded from important degrees of freedom, as the inhabitants of Peñalolén who defended his office, part of the bright side of modernity and do not want to see Chile with a Molotov at La Moneda.
The first part I explained about democracy as an expression of city government, saying the second concerning the causes of violent participation in democracy. If you have listened carefully to both arguments, we realize that democracy in this country the necessary conditions for citizens to participate and express themselves, but it depends on us to use participation as a way of deepening democracy improve in terms of quality and intensity.
Participation is not theoretical, but it is the soul of democracy and without this scheme can not exist. In this regard, I take the words of German philosopher Hannah Arendt, who said precisely on this point, that: "Democracy must provide opportunities for people to settle as citizens or as participants in democracy.
V. Andres Jouannet
Doctor of Political Science University of Heidelberg
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)